 Connection
David Camidge to Endpoint Determination
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Camidge has written about Endpoint Determination.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.847 |
|
|
|
-
Camidge DR, Lee EQ, Lin NU, Margolin K, Ahluwalia MS, Bendszus M, Chang SM, Dancey J, de Vries EGE, Harris GJ, Hodi FS, Lassman AB, Macdonald DR, Peereboom DM, Schiff D, Soffietti R, van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Wen PY. Clinical trial design for systemic agents in patients with brain metastases from solid tumours: a guideline by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases working group. Lancet Oncol. 2018 01; 19(1):e20-e32.
Score: 0.616
-
Camidge DR, Davies MJ, Laud PJ, Marshall AL, Cockerill M, Smith PD, Hughes AM. Factors determining the optimal body site and method for obtaining punch biopsies of human skin as a tissue in which to assess pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic endpoints in drug development studies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006 Jan; 57(1):52-8.
Score: 0.066
-
Camidge DR, Pemberton MN, Growcott JW, Johnstone D, Laud PJ, Foster JR, Randall KJ, Hughes AM. Assessing proliferation, cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic end points in human buccal punch biopsies for use as pharmacodynamic biomarkers in drug development. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jul 25; 93(2):208-15.
Score: 0.065
-
Camidge DR, Randall KR, Foster JR, Sadler CJ, Wright JA, Soames AR, Laud PJ, Smith PD, Hughes AM. Plucked human hair as a tissue in which to assess pharmacodynamic end points during drug development studies. Br J Cancer. 2005 May 23; 92(10):1837-41.
Score: 0.064
-
Gadgeel SM, Shaw AT, Govindan R, Gandhi L, Socinski MA, Camidge DR, De Petris L, Kim DW, Chiappori A, Moro-Sibilot DL, Duruisseaux M, Crino L, De Pas T, Dansin E, Tessmer A, Yang JC, Han JY, Bordogna W, Golding S, Zeaiter A, Ou SI. Pooled Analysis of CNS Response to Alectinib in Two Studies of Pretreated Patients With ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 12; 34(34):4079-4085.
Score: 0.035
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|