 Connection
Malik Kahook to Ophthalmic Solutions
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Malik Kahook has written about Ophthalmic Solutions.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.012 |
|
|
|
-
Kahook MY, Rapuano CJ, Messmer EM, Radcliffe NM, Galor A, Baudouin C. Preservatives and ocular surface disease: A review. Ocul Surf. 2024 10; 34:213-224.
Score: 0.825
-
Seibold LK, Wagner BD, Lynch AM, Kahook MY. The Diurnal and Nocturnal Effects of Pilocarpine on Intraocular Pressure in Patients Receiving Prostaglandin Analog Monotherapy. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2018 10; 34(8):590-595.
Score: 0.548
-
Rolando M, Crider JY, Kahook MY. Ophthalmic preservatives: focus on polyquaternium-1. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011 Nov; 8(11):1425-38.
Score: 0.337
-
Kahook MY, Noecker R. Quantitative analysis of conjunctival goblet cells after chronic application of topical drops. Adv Ther. 2008 Aug; 25(8):743-51.
Score: 0.272
-
Kahook MY, Serle JB, Mah FS, Kim T, Raizman MB, Heah T, Ramirez-Davis N, Kopczynski CC, Usner DW, Novack GD. Long-term Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy Evaluation of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution: Rho Kinase Elevated IOP Treatment Trial (ROCKET-2). Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 04; 200:130-137.
Score: 0.140
-
Ianchulev T, Chayet A, Kahook M, Packer M, Pasquale L, Weinreb RN. Pharmacodynamic profile of mydriatic agents delivered by ocular piezo-ejection microdosing compared with conventional eyedropper. Ther Deliv. 2016 11; 7(11):751-760.
Score: 0.120
-
SooHoo JR, Golas L, Marando CM, Seibold LK, Pantcheva MB, Ramulu PY, Kahook MY. Glaucoma Patient Treatment Preferences. Ophthalmology. 2016 07; 123(7):1621-2.
Score: 0.115
-
Marando CM, Seibold LK, SooHoo JR, Pantcheva MB, Ramulu PY, Kahook MY. The Utility of Cap Color and Bottle Characteristics for Topical Glaucoma Therapy. Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec; 122(12):2577-8.
Score: 0.109
-
Seibold LK, Kahook MY. The diurnal and nocturnal effect of travoprost with sofZia on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan; 157(1):44-49.e1.
Score: 0.098
-
Seibold LK, Ammar DA, Kahook MY. Acute effects of glaucoma medications and benzalkonium chloride on pre-adipocyte proliferation and adipocyte cytotoxicity in vitro. Curr Eye Res. 2013 Jan; 38(1):70-4.
Score: 0.091
-
Ammar DA, Noecker RJ, Kahook MY. Effects of benzalkonium chloride-preserved, polyquad-preserved, and sofZia-preserved topical glaucoma medications on human ocular epithelial cells. Adv Ther. 2010 Nov; 27(11):837-45.
Score: 0.079
-
Ammar DA, Kahook MY. The effects of combination glaucoma medications on ocular surface epithelial cells. Adv Ther. 2009 Oct; 26(10):970-5.
Score: 0.074
-
Kahook MY, Noecker RJ. Comparison of corneal and conjunctival changes after dosing of travoprost preserved with sofZia, latanoprost with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, and preservative-free artificial tears. Cornea. 2008 Apr; 27(3):339-43.
Score: 0.066
-
Torres JA, Fischer NA, Seibold LK, Pantcheva MB, Kahook MY, SooHoo JR. A Survey of Patient Perceptions and Preferences for Glaucoma Treatment with Intravitreal Injections. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018 Jul - Aug; 1(1):61-65.
Score: 0.034
-
Varadaraj V, Kahook MY, Ramulu PY, Pitha IF. Patient Acceptance of Sustained Glaucoma Treatment Strategies. J Glaucoma. 2018 04; 27(4):328-335.
Score: 0.033
-
Dave P, Villarreal G, Friedman DS, Kahook MY, Ramulu PY. Ability of Bottle Cap Color to Facilitate Accurate Patient-Physician Communication Regarding Medication Identity in Patients with Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec; 122(12):2373-9.
Score: 0.028
-
Barker GT, Cook PF, Schmiege SJ, Kahook MY, Kammer JA, Mansberger SL. Psychometric properties of the Glaucoma Treatment Compliance Assessment Tool in a multicenter trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun; 159(6):1092-1099.e2.
Score: 0.027
-
Cronin TH, Kahook MY, Lathrop KL, Noecker RJ. Accuracy and performance of a commercially available Dosing Aid. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr; 91(4):497-9.
Score: 0.015
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|