 Connection
William Henderson to Quality Assurance, Health Care
This is a "connection" page, showing publications William Henderson has written about Quality Assurance, Health Care.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.368 |
|
|
|
-
Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg. 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S19-27.
Score: 0.288
-
Dillon P, Hammermeister K, Morrato E, Kempe A, Oldham K, Moss L, Marchildon M, Ziegler M, Steeger J, Rowell K, Shiloach M, Henderson W. Developing a NSQIP module to measure outcomes in children's surgical care: opportunity and challenge. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 May; 17(2):131-40.
Score: 0.259
-
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002 Jan; 137(1):20-7.
Score: 0.167
-
Bush RL, DePalma RG, Itani KM, Henderson WG, Smith TS, Gunnar WP. Outcomes of care of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Veterans Health Administration facilities: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Am J Surg. 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S41-8.
Score: 0.072
-
Esnaola NF, Hall BL, Hosokawa PW, Ayanian JZ, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Zinner MJ, Rogers SO. Race and surgical outcomes: it is not all black and white. Ann Surg. 2008 Oct; 248(4):647-55.
Score: 0.067
-
Romano PS, Mull HJ, Rivard PE, Zhao S, Henderson WG, Loveland S, Tsilimingras D, Christiansen CL, Rosen AK. Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb; 44(1):182-204.
Score: 0.067
-
Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, Jonasson O, Jones RS, Campbell DA, Fink AS, Mentzer RM, Neumayer L, Hammermeister K, Mosca C, Healey N. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study. Ann Surg. 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36.
Score: 0.066
-
Lee J, El-Tamer M, Schifftner T, Turrentine FE, Henderson WG, Khuri S, Hanks JB, Inabnet WB. Open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 May; 206(5):953-9; discussion 959-61.
Score: 0.064
-
Englesbe MJ, Pelletier SJ, Magee JC, Gauger P, Schifftner T, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell DA. Seasonal variation in surgical outcomes as measured by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Ann Surg. 2007 Sep; 246(3):456-62; discussion 463-5.
Score: 0.062
-
Davis CL, Pierce JR, Henderson W, Spencer CD, Tyler C, Langberg R, Swafford J, Felan GS, Kearns MA, Booker B. Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr; 204(4):550-60.
Score: 0.060
-
Bush RL, Johnson ML, Hedayati N, Henderson WG, Lin PH, Lumsden AB. Performance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in high-risk patients: results from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Feb; 45(2):227-233; discussion 233-5.
Score: 0.059
-
Khuri SF, Henderson WG. The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care. World J Surg. 2005 Oct; 29(10):1222-9.
Score: 0.054
-
Atherly A, Fink AS, Campbell DC, Mentzer RM, Henderson W, Khuri S, Culler SD. Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):566-70.
Score: 0.051
-
Bishop MJ, Souders JE, Peterson CM, Henderson WG, Domino KB. Factors associated with unanticipated day of surgery deaths in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec; 107(6):1924-35.
Score: 0.017
-
Main DS, Henderson WG, Pratte K, Cavender TA, Schifftner TL, Kinney A, Stoner T, Steiner JF, Fink AS, Khuri SF. Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a descriptive analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun; 204(6):1157-65.
Score: 0.015
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|