 Connection
Michael Allen to Suicidal Ideation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Allen has written about Suicidal Ideation.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.640 |
|
|
|
-
Bryan CJ, Thomsen CJ, Bryan AO, Baker JC, May AM, Allen MH. Scores on the suicide cognitions scale-revised (SCS-R) predict future suicide attempts among primary care patients denying suicide ideation and prior attempts. J Affect Disord. 2022 09 15; 313:21-26.
Score: 0.596
-
Boudreaux ED, Jaques ML, Brady KM, Matson A, Allen MH. The Patient Safety Screener: Validation of a Brief Suicide Risk Screener for Emergency Department Settings. Arch Suicide Res. 2017 Jan 02; 21(1):52-61.
Score: 0.384
-
Boudreaux ED, Jaques ML, Brady KM, Matson A, Allen MH. The patient safety screener: validation of a brief suicide risk screener for emergency department settings. Arch Suicide Res. 2015; 19(2):151-60.
Score: 0.355
-
Allen MH, Abar BW, McCormick M, Barnes DH, Haukoos J, Garmel GM, Boudreaux ED. Screening for suicidal ideation and attempts among emergency department medical patients: instrument and results from the Psychiatric Emergency Research Collaboration. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2013 Jun; 43(3):313-23.
Score: 0.312
-
Bryan CJ, Allen MH, Wastler HM, Bryan AO, Baker JC, May AM, Thomsen CJ. Rapid intensification of suicide risk preceding suicidal behavior among primary care patients. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023 06; 53(3):352-361.
Score: 0.157
-
Bryan CJ, Allen MH, Thomsen CJ, May AM, Baker JC, Bryan AO, Harris JA, Cunningham CA, Taylor KB, Wine MD, Young J, Williams S, White K, Smith L, Lawson WC, Hope T, Russell W, Hinkson KD, Cheney T, Arne K. Improving Suicide Risk Screening to Identify the Highest Risk Patients: Results From the PRImary Care Screening Methods (PRISM) Study. Ann Fam Med. 2021 Nov-Dec; 19(6):492-498.
Score: 0.142
-
Dunlap LJ, Orme S, Zarkin GA, Arias SA, Miller IW, Camargo CA, Sullivan AF, Allen MH, Goldstein AB, Manton AP, Clark R, Boudreaux ED. Screening and Intervention for Suicide Prevention: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the ED-SAFE Interventions. Psychiatr Serv. 2019 12 01; 70(12):1082-1087.
Score: 0.122
-
Bryan CJ, Allen MH, Thomsen CJ, May AM, Baker JC, Harris JA, Bryan AO, Russell WA. The PRImary care Screening Methods (PRISM) study: Rationale and design considerations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 09; 84:105823.
Score: 0.122
-
Boudreaux ED, Larkin C, Kini N, Capoccia L, Allen MH, Goldstein Grumet J, Silverman MM, McKeon R, Barton B, Miller I, Formica SW, Camargo CA. Predictive utility of an emergency department decision support tool in patients with active suicidal ideation. Psychol Serv. 2018 Aug; 15(3):270-278.
Score: 0.114
-
Miller IW, Camargo CA, Arias SA, Sullivan AF, Allen MH, Goldstein AB, Manton AP, Espinola JA, Jones R, Hasegawa K, Boudreaux ED. Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 06 01; 74(6):563-570.
Score: 0.105
-
Arias SA, Miller I, Camargo CA, Sullivan AF, Goldstein AB, Allen MH, Manton AP, Boudreaux ED. Factors Associated With Suicide Outcomes 12 Months After Screening Positive for Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department. Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Feb; 67(2):206-13.
Score: 0.095
-
Ting SA, Sullivan AF, Miller I, Espinola JA, Allen MH, Camargo CA, Boudreaux ED. Multicenter study of predictors of suicide screening in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb; 19(2):239-43.
Score: 0.072
-
Bryan CJ, Allen MH, Bryan AO, Thomsen CJ, Baker JC, May AM. Does Suicide Risk Screening Improve the Identification of Primary Care Patients Who Will Attempt Suicide Versus Depression Screening Alone? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 12; 49(12):680-688.
Score: 0.040
-
Boudreaux ED, Camargo CA, Arias SA, Sullivan AF, Allen MH, Goldstein AB, Manton AP, Espinola JA, Miller IW. Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr; 50(4):445-453.
Score: 0.024
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|