 Connection
Lori James to Adult
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lori James has written about Adult.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.328 |
|
|
|
-
Schmank CJ, James LE. Adults of all ages experience increased tip-of-the-tongue states under ostensible evaluative observation. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 07; 27(4):517-531.
Score: 0.038
-
James LE, Chambers BN, Placzek CL. How scenes containing visual errors affect speech fluency in young and older adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2018 07; 25(4):520-534.
Score: 0.033
-
Castro N, James LE. Differences between young and older adults' spoken language production in descriptions of negative versus neutral pictures. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2014; 21(2):222-38.
Score: 0.025
-
Davis HP, Klebe KJ, Guinther PM, Schroder KB, Cornwell RE, James LE. Subjective organization, verbal learning, and forgetting across the life span: from 5 to 89. Exp Aging Res. 2013; 39(1):1-26.
Score: 0.024
-
James LE, Tauber SK, McMahan EA, Oberle S, Martinez AP, Fogler KA. Searching for interference effects in learning new face-name associations. Memory. 2012; 20(2):155-66.
Score: 0.022
-
Steinmetz SE, Benight CC, Bishop SL, James LE. My Disaster Recovery: a pilot randomized controlled trial of an Internet intervention. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012; 25(5):593-600.
Score: 0.022
-
Miller MM, James LE. Is the generic pronoun he still comprehended as excluding women? Am J Psychol. 2009; 122(4):483-96.
Score: 0.018
-
James LE, Fogler KA, Tauber SK. Recognition memory measures yield disproportionate effects of aging on learning face-name associations. Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep; 23(3):657-64.
Score: 0.018
-
Fogler KA, James LE. Charlie brown versus snow white: the effects of descriptiveness on young and older adults' retrieval of proper names. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jul; 62(4):P201-7.
Score: 0.016
-
James LE, Fogler KA. Meeting Mr Davis vs Mr Davin: effects of name frequency on learning proper names in young and older adults. Memory. 2007 May; 15(4):366-74.
Score: 0.016
-
James LE, MacKay DG. New age-linked asymmetries: aging and the processing of familiar versus novel language on the input versus output side. Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar; 22(1):94-103.
Score: 0.016
-
James LE. Specific effects of aging on proper name retrieval: now you see them, now you don't. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 May; 61(3):P180-3.
Score: 0.015
-
James LE. Meeting Mr. Farmer versus meeting a farmer: specific effects of aging on learning proper names. Psychol Aging. 2004 Sep; 19(3):515-22.
Score: 0.013
-
MacKay DG, James LE. Sequencing, speech production, and selective effects of aging on phonological and morphological speech errors. Psychol Aging. 2004 Mar; 19(1):93-107.
Score: 0.013
-
Shafto MA, James LE, Abrams L, Can C. Age-related changes in word retrieval vary by self-reported anxiety but not depression symptoms. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2019 09; 26(5):767-780.
Score: 0.009
-
Shafto MA, James LE, Abrams L, Tyler LK. Age-Related Increases in Verbal Knowledge Are Not Associated With Word Finding Problems in the Cam-CAN Cohort: What You Know Won't Hurt You. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Jan; 72(1):100-106.
Score: 0.008
-
Benight CC, Shoji K, James LE, Waldrep EE, Delahanty DL, Cieslak R. Trauma Coping Self-Efficacy: A Context-Specific Self-Efficacy Measure for Traumatic Stress. Psychol Trauma. 2015 Nov; 7(6):591-599.
Score: 0.007
-
Tauber SK, James LE, Noble PM. The effects of age on using prosody to convey meaning and on judging communicative effectiveness. Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep; 25(3):702-7.
Score: 0.005
-
MacKay DG, James LE, Hadley CB, Fogler KA. Speech errors of amnesic H.M.: unlike everyday slips-of-the-tongue. Cortex. 2011 Mar; 47(3):377-408.
Score: 0.005
-
Fogler KA, James LE, Crandall EA. How name descriptiveness impacts proper name learning in young and older adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2010 Sep; 17(5):505-18.
Score: 0.005
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|