Connection
Lori James to Age Factors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lori James has written about Age Factors.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.688 |
|
|
|
-
Fogler KA, James LE. Charlie brown versus snow white: the effects of descriptiveness on young and older adults' retrieval of proper names. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jul; 62(4):P201-7.
Score: 0.159
-
Shafto MA, Abrams L, James LE. Age-related differences in the evaluation of highly arousing language. Psychol Aging. 2024 May; 39(3):288-298.
Score: 0.127
-
Schmank CJ, James LE. Adults of all ages experience increased tip-of-the-tongue states under ostensible evaluative observation. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 07; 27(4):517-531.
Score: 0.091
-
Metz MJ, James LE. Specific effects of the Trier Social Stress Test on speech fluency in young and older adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2019 07; 26(4):558-576.
Score: 0.085
-
Castro N, James LE. Differences between young and older adults' spoken language production in descriptions of negative versus neutral pictures. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2014; 21(2):222-38.
Score: 0.060
-
James LE, Fogler KA, Tauber SK. Recognition memory measures yield disproportionate effects of aging on learning face-name associations. Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep; 23(3):657-64.
Score: 0.043
-
James LE, Fogler KA. Meeting Mr Davis vs Mr Davin: effects of name frequency on learning proper names in young and older adults. Memory. 2007 May; 15(4):366-74.
Score: 0.039
-
James LE, MacKay DG. New age-linked asymmetries: aging and the processing of familiar versus novel language on the input versus output side. Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar; 22(1):94-103.
Score: 0.039
-
MacKay DG, James LE. Sequencing, speech production, and selective effects of aging on phonological and morphological speech errors. Psychol Aging. 2004 Mar; 19(1):93-107.
Score: 0.031
-
Tauber SK, James LE, Noble PM. The effects of age on using prosody to convey meaning and on judging communicative effectiveness. Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep; 25(3):702-7.
Score: 0.012