 Connection
Daniel Matlock to Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Matlock has written about Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.663 |
|
|
|
-
Wallace BC, Allen LA, Knoepke CE, Glasgow RE, Lewis CL, Fairclough DL, Helmkamp LJ, Fitzgerald MD, Tzou WS, Kramer DB, Varosy PD, Gupta SK, Mandrola JM, Brancato SC, Peterson PN, Matlock DD. A multicenter trial of a shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD rationale, design, Medicare changes, and pilot data. Am Heart J. 2020 08; 226:161-173.
Score: 0.431
-
Sepucha K, Elmariah S, Valentine KD, Cavender MA, Chang Y, Devireddy CM, Dickert NW, Gama KD, Knoepke CE, Korngold E, Kumbhani DJ, Matlock DD, Messenger JC, Strong S, Thourani VH, Nathan A, Quader N, Brescia AA. The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial. Trials. 2024 Dec 18; 25(1):820.
Score: 0.149
-
Ingle MP, Check D, Slack DH, Cross SH, Ernecoff NC, Matlock DD, Kavalieratos D. Use of Theoretical Frameworks in the Development and Testing of Palliative Care Interventions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 03; 63(3):e271-e280.
Score: 0.030
-
Venechuk GE, Khazanie P, Page RL, Knoepke CE, Helmkamp LJ, Peterson PN, Pierce K, Thompson JS, Huang J, Strader JR, Dow TJ, Richards L, Trinkley KE, Kao DP, McIlvennan CK, Magid DJ, Buttrick PM, Matlock DD, Allen LA. An Electronically delivered, Patient-activation tool for Intensification of medications for Chronic Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction: Rationale and design of the EPIC-HF trial. Am Heart J. 2020 11; 229:144-155.
Score: 0.028
-
McIlvennan CK, Matlock DD, Allen LA, Thompson JS, Ranby KW, Sannes TS. Perceived Stress and Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Decisional Conflict in Dyads Considering a Left Ventricular Assist Device. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 03; 13(3):e006155.
Score: 0.027
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|