 Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Marie Banich and Tor Wager.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.639 |
|
|
|
-
Banich MT, Smolker HR, Snyder HR, Lewis-Peacock JA, Godinez DA, Wager TD, Hankin BL. Turning down the heat: Neural mechanisms of cognitive control for inhibiting task-irrelevant emotional information during adolescence. Neuropsychologia. 2019 03 04; 125:93-108.
Score: 0.173
-
de la Vega A, Yarkoni T, Wager TD, Banich MT. Large-scale Meta-analysis Suggests Low Regional Modularity in Lateral Frontal Cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2018 10 01; 28(10):3414-3428.
Score: 0.170
-
Woo CW, Koban L, Kross E, Lindquist MA, Banich MT, Ruzic L, Andrews-Hanna JR, Wager TD. Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection. Nat Commun. 2014 Nov 17; 5:5380.
Score: 0.130
-
Reineberg AE, Banich MT, Wager TD, Friedman NP. Context-specific activations are a hallmark of the neural basis of individual differences in general executive function. Neuroimage. 2022 04 01; 249:118845.
Score: 0.053
-
Casey BJ, Cannonier T, Conley MI, Cohen AO, Barch DM, Heitzeg MM, Soules ME, Teslovich T, Dellarco DV, Garavan H, Orr CA, Wager TD, Banich MT, Speer NK, Sutherland MT, Riedel MC, Dick AS, Bjork JM, Thomas KM, Chaarani B, Mejia MH, Hagler DJ, Daniela Cornejo M, Sicat CS, Harms MP, Dosenbach NUF, Rosenberg M, Earl E, Bartsch H, Watts R, Polimeni JR, Kuperman JM, Fair DA, Dale AM. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 32:43-54.
Score: 0.041
-
de la Vega A, Chang LJ, Banich MT, Wager TD, Yarkoni T. Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of Human Medial Frontal Cortex Reveals Tripartite Functional Organization. J Neurosci. 2016 06 15; 36(24):6553-62.
Score: 0.036
-
Panta SR, Wang R, Fries J, Kalyanam R, Speer N, Banich M, Kiehl K, King M, Milham M, Wager TD, Turner JA, Plis SM, Calhoun VD. A Tool for Interactive Data Visualization: Application to Over 10,000 Brain Imaging and Phantom MRI Data Sets. Front Neuroinform. 2016; 10:9.
Score: 0.036
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|