Connection
Robin Shandas to Fontan Procedure
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robin Shandas has written about Fontan Procedure.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
![](https://profiles.ucdenver.edu/Framework/Images/connection_left.gif) |
|
![](https://profiles.ucdenver.edu/Framework/Images/connection_right.gif) |
|
0.849 |
|
|
|
-
Lacour-Gayet FG, Lanning CJ, Stoica S, Wang R, Rech BA, Goldberg S, Shandas R. An artificial right ventricle for failing fontan: in vitro and computational study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul; 88(1):170-6.
Score: 0.286
-
Wang R, Lacour-Gayet FG, Lanning CJ, Rech BA, Kilfoil PJ, Hertzberg J, Shandas R. Initial experience with the development and numerical and in vitro studies of a novel low-pressure artificial right ventricle for pediatric Fontan patients. ASAIO J. 2006 Nov-Dec; 52(6):682-92.
Score: 0.238
-
DeGroff CG, Shandas R. Designing the optimal Total Cavopulmonary Connection: pulsatile versus steady flow experiments. Med Sci Monit. 2002 Mar; 8(3):MT41-5.
Score: 0.172
-
DeGroff C, Birnbaum B, Shandas R, Orlando W, Hertzberg J. Computational simulations of the total cavo-pulmonary connection: insights in optimizing numerical solutions. Med Eng Phys. 2005 Mar; 27(2):135-46.
Score: 0.053
-
DeGroff CG, Carlton JD, Weinberg CE, Ellison MC, Shandas R, Valdes-Cruz L. Effect of vessel size on the flow efficiency of the total cavopulmonary connection: in vitro studies. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002 Mar-Apr; 23(2):171-7.
Score: 0.043
-
Orlando W, Hertzberg J, Shandas R, DeGroff C. Reverse flow in compliant vessels and its implications for the Fontan procedure: numerical studies. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2002; 38:321-6.
Score: 0.043
-
Orlando W, Shandas R, DeGroff C. Efficiency differences in computational simulations of the total cavo-pulmonary circulation with and without compliant vessel walls. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006 Mar; 81(3):220-7.
Score: 0.014
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|