 Connection
Jeanelle Sheeder to Contraception Behavior
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jeanelle Sheeder has written about Contraception Behavior.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.291 |
|
|
|
-
Harrison MS, Bunge-Montes S, Rivera C, Jimenez-Zambrano A, Heinrichs G, Bolanos A, Asturias E, Berman S, Sheeder J. Primary and secondary three-month outcomes of a cluster-randomized trial of home-based postpartum contraceptive delivery in southwest Trifinio, Guatemala. Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 20; 17(1):127.
Score: 0.676
-
Richards MJ, Sheeder J. Adolescents: their futures and their contraceptive decisions. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 27(5):301-5.
Score: 0.442
-
Sheeder J, Teal SB, Crane LA, Stevens-Simon C. Adolescent childbearing ambivalence: is it the sum of its parts? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010 Apr; 23(2):86-92.
Score: 0.316
-
Sheeder J, Tocce K, Stevens-Simon C. Reasons for ineffective contraceptive use antedating adolescent pregnancies: part 2: a proxy for childbearing intentions. Matern Child Health J. 2009 May; 13(3):306-17.
Score: 0.290
-
Sheeder J, Tocce K, Stevens-Simon C. Reasons for ineffective contraceptive use antedating adolescent pregnancies part 1: an indicator of gaps in family planning services. Matern Child Health J. 2009 May; 13(3):295-305.
Score: 0.289
-
Stevens-Simon C, Sheeder J. Paradoxical adolescent reproductive decisions. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004 Feb; 17(1):29-33.
Score: 0.215
-
Hoopes AJ, Akers AY, Jimenez-Zambrano A, Cain S, Maslowsky J, Sheeder J. Development of a clinical questionnaire to support contraception decisions in an adolescent reproductive health clinic in Colorado. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 09; 55(3):140-152.
Score: 0.208
-
Harrison MS, Zucker R, Scarbro S, Sevick C, Sheeder J, Davidson AJ. Postpartum Contraceptive Use Among Denver-Based Adolescents and Young Adults: Association with Subsequent Repeat Delivery. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug; 33(4):393-397.e1.
Score: 0.165
-
Bastow B, Sheeder J, Guiahi M, Teal S. Condom use in adolescents and young women following initiation of long- or short-acting contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2018 Jan; 97(1):70-75.
Score: 0.139
-
Richards MJ, Peters M, Sheeder J, Kaul P. Contraception and Adolescent Males: An Opportunity for Providers. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Mar; 58(3):366-8.
Score: 0.123
-
Lazorwitz A, Sheeder J, Teal S, Guiahi M. Does the expectation or perception of noncontraceptive benefits lead to higher rates of short-acting reversible contraceptive continuation for adolescents and young adult women? Contraception. 2015 May; 91(5):380-5.
Score: 0.115
-
Tocce K, Sheeder J, Python J, Teal SB. Long acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents: early initiation of etonogestrel implant is superior to IUDs in the outpatient setting. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb; 25(1):59-63.
Score: 0.092
-
Jumping-Eagle S, Sheeder J, Kelly LS, Stevens-Simon C. Association of conventional goals and perceptions of pregnancy with female teenagers' pregnancy avoidance behavior and attitudes. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008 Jun; 40(2):74-80.
Score: 0.072
-
Stevens-Simon C, Sheeder J, Harter S. Teen contraceptive decisions: childbearing intentions are the tip of the iceberg. Women Health. 2005; 42(1):55-73.
Score: 0.057
-
Smith H, Sheeder J, Ehmer A, Hasbrouck S, Scott S, Ashby B. Implementing Interconception Care in a Dyadic Adolescent Mother-Child Clinic. Matern Child Health J. 2021 Nov; 25(11):1670-1676.
Score: 0.045
-
Dunbar J, Sheeder J, Lezotte D, Dabelea D, Stevens-Simon C. Age at menarche and first pregnancy among psychosocially at-risk adolescents. Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct; 98(10):1822-4.
Score: 0.018
-
Kelly LS, Sheeder J, Stevens-Simon C. Why lightning strikes twice: postpartum resumption of sexual activity during adolescence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005 Oct; 18(5):327-35.
Score: 0.015
-
Kelly L, Sheeder J, Stevens-Simon C. Teen home pregnancy test takers: more worried or more wishful? Pediatrics. 2004 Mar; 113(3 Pt 1):581-4.
Score: 0.013
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|