Connection
William Shellhart to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications William Shellhart has written about Humans.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
0.077 |
|
|
|
-
Oesterle LJ, Owens JM, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Perceived vs measured forces of interarch elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar; 141(3):298-306.
Score: 0.011
-
Farrow ML, Newman SM, Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC. Filled and unfilled restorative materials to reduce enamel decalcification during fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov; 132(5):578.e1-6.
Score: 0.008
-
Shellhart WC. Treatment planning decisions: an overview. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Mar; 9(1):1-21.
Score: 0.005
-
Shellhart WC, Oesterle LJ. Uprighting molars without extrusion. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Mar; 130(3):381-5.
Score: 0.004
-
Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC. Maxillary midline diastemas: a look at the causes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Jan; 130(1):85-94.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Jasper S, Abrams H, Wilson T. Case report: management of significant incisor root resorption associated with maxillary canine impaction. Angle Orthod. 1998 Apr; 68(2):187-92.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Oesterle LJ. Assessment of CD-ROM technology in classroom teaching. J Dent Educ. 1997 Oct; 61(10):817-20.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Oesterle LJ, Cailleteau JG. Effective orthodontics: achieving objectives, avoiding misadventures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Jan; 128(1):97-104.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Moawad MI, Matheny J, Paterson RL, Hicks EP. A prospective study of lip adaptation during six months of simulated mandibular dental arch expansion. Angle Orthod. 1997; 67(1):47-54.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Moawad M, Lake P. Case report: implants as anchorage for molar uprighting and intrusion. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(3):169-72.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Moawad MI, Paterson RL, Matheny J. Lip adaptation to simulated dental arch expansion. Part 1: Reliability and precision of two lip pressure measurement mechanisms. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(4):249-54.
Score: 0.004
-
Lamberton JA, Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Newman SM, Harrell RE, Tilliss T, Singh N, Carey CM. Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan; 149(1):15-23.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC. Equilibrium clarified. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Oct; 108(4):394-401.
Score: 0.004
-
Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kluemper GT, Hicks EP, Kaplan AL. Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65(5):327-34.
Score: 0.003
-
Salmassian R, Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Newman SM. Comparison of the efficacy of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in controlling pain after orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr; 135(4):516-21.
Score: 0.002
-
Shellhart WC, Casamassimo PS, Hagerman RJ, Belanger GK. Oral findings in fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1986 Jan-Feb; 23(1-2):179-87.
Score: 0.002
-
Casamassimo PS, Mcllvaine WB, Hagerman R, Shellhart WC. General anesthesia and fragile X syndrome: report of a case. Anesth Prog. 1985 May-Jun; 32(3):104-6.
Score: 0.002
-
Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Nov; 114(5):514-9.
Score: 0.001
-
Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. Effect of tacking time on bond strength of light-cured adhesives. J Clin Orthod. 1997 Jul; 31(7):449-53.
Score: 0.001
-
Moawad MI, Shellhart WC, Matheny J, Paterson RL, Hicks EP. Lip adaptation to simulated dental arch expansion. Part 2: One week of simulated expansion. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(4):255-60.
Score: 0.001
-
Seiler CL, Shellhart WC, Casamassimo PS. Efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine for the severely handicapped. ASDC J Dent Child. 1990 Jul-Aug; 57(4):263-6.
Score: 0.001
-
Casamassimo PS, Shellhart WC, Hagerman R. Fragile X syndrome: a review. J Oral Med. 1986 Oct-Dec; 41(4):228-33.
Score: 0.000
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|