Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Contact Us
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us.

Connection

Laura Scherer to Risk Assessment

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Scherer has written about Risk Assessment.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.967
 
  1. Scherer LD, Ubel PA, McClure J, Greene SM, Alford SH, Holtzman L, Exe N, Fagerlin A. Belief in numbers: When and why women disbelieve tailored breast cancer risk statistics. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Aug; 92(2):253-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  2. Scherer LD, Matlock DD. Communicating Personalized Benefits of Conservative versus Invasive Treatment of Chronic Coronary Disease: Reflections From the Risk Communication Literature. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Oct; 17(10):e011463.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  3. Scherer LD, Lewis CL, McCaffery K, Hersch J, Cappella JN, Tate C, Morse B, Arnett K, Mosley B, Smyth HL, Schapira MM. Mammography Screening Preferences Among Screening-Eligible Women in Their 40s : A National U.S. Survey. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug; 177(8):1069-1077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  4. Waters EA, Taber JM, McQueen A, Housten AJ, Studts JL, Scherer LD. Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 12; 29(12):2389-2394.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  5. Morgan DJ, Scherer LD, Korenstein D. Improving Physician Communication About Treatment Decisions: Reconsideration of "Risks vs Benefits". JAMA. 2020 Sep 08; 324(10):937-938.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  6. Scherer LD, Kullgren JT, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Shaffer VA, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences Predict Responses to Information about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening. Med Decis Making. 2018 08; 38(6):708-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  7. Kang SK, Scherer LD, Megibow AJ, Higuita LJ, Kim N, Braithwaite RS, Fagerlin A. A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb; 210(2):369-375.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  8. Scherer LD, Shaffer VA, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Fagerlin A. The role of the affect heuristic and cancer anxiety in responding to negative information about medical tests. Psychol Health. 2018 02; 33(2):292-312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  9. Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Tarini BA. Influence of "GERD" label on parents' decision to medicate infants. Pediatrics. 2013 May; 131(5):839-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  10. Mattix KD, Tataria M, Holmes J, Kristoffersen K, Brown R, Groner J, Scaife E, Mooney D, Nance M, Scherer L. Pediatric pancreatic trauma: predictors of nonoperative management failure and associated outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Feb; 42(2):340-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  11. Waters EA, Foust JL, Scherer LD, McQueen A, Taber JM. Adherence of Internet-Based Cancer Risk Assessment Tools to Best Practices in Risk Communication: Content Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021 01 25; 23(1):e23318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  12. Hoerger M, Scherer LD, Fagerlin A. Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention. Health Psychol. 2016 Jun; 35(6):594-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  13. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Witteman HO, Dickson M, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Kahn VC, Exe NL, Valerio M, Holtzman LG, Scherer LD, Fagerlin A. Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs. Med Decis Making. 2014 05; 34(4):443-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. Dillard AJ, Scherer L, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, McClure JB, Greene S, Stark A, Fagerlin A. Breast cancer anxiety's associations with responses to a chemoprevention decision aid. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan; 77:13-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2026 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)