 Connection
Laura Scherer to Surveys and Questionnaires
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Scherer has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.362 |
|
|
|
-
Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Eliciting Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences with a Single Question: Development and Validation of the MM1. Med Decis Making. 2020 05; 40(4):545-550.
Score: 0.314
-
Scherer LD, Kullgren JT, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Shaffer VA, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences Predict Responses to Information about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening. Med Decis Making. 2018 08; 38(6):708-718.
Score: 0.274
-
Bayerman SF, Li M, Syed A, Scherer LD. Development of a Naturalness Preference Scale. Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov; 43(7-8):821-834.
Score: 0.098
-
Waters EA, Taber JM, Ackermann N, Maki J, McQueen AM, Scherer LD. Testing Explanations for Skepticism of Personalized Risk Information. Med Decis Making. 2023 05; 43(4):430-444.
Score: 0.095
-
Thorpe A, Fagerlin A, Drews FA, Shoemaker H, Scherer LD. Self-reported health behaviors and risk perceptions following the COVID-19 vaccination rollout in the USA: an online survey study. Public Health. 2022 Jul; 208:68-71.
Score: 0.090
-
Valentine KD, Wegier P, Shaffer VA, Scherer LD. The Impact of 4 Risk Communication Interventions on Cancer Screening Preferences and Knowledge. Med Decis Making. 2022 04; 42(3):387-397.
Score: 0.085
-
Wallace B, Matlock DD, Scherer A, Fagerlin A, Scherer LD. Life Support Preferences in the Context of COVID-19: Results from a National US Survey. Med Decis Making. 2021 11; 41(8):963-969.
Score: 0.084
-
Scherer LD, Shaffer VA, Caverly T, DeWitt J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Predicts Patient Preferences for High- and Low-Benefit Care. Med Decis Making. 2020 01; 40(1):72-80.
Score: 0.076
-
Scherer LD, Caverly TJ, Burke J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Steinley D, McCarthy DM, Roney M, Fagerlin A. Development of the Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale. Health Psychol. 2016 Nov; 35(11):1276-1287.
Score: 0.061
-
Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Tarini BA. Influence of "GERD" label on parents' decision to medicate infants. Pediatrics. 2013 May; 131(5):839-45.
Score: 0.048
-
Navanandan N, McNulty MC, Suresh K, Freeman J, Scherer LD, Tyler A. Factors Associated With Clinician Self-Reported Resource Use in Acute Care and Ambulatory Pediatrics. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2023 05; 62(4):329-337.
Score: 0.023
-
Levy AG, Thorpe A, Scherer LD, Scherer AM, Drews FA, Butler JM, Burpo N, Shoemaker H, Stevens V, Fagerlin A. Misrepresentation and Nonadherence Regarding COVID-19 Public Health Measures. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 10 03; 5(10):e2235837.
Score: 0.023
-
Korenstein D, Scherer LD, Foy A, Pineles L, Lydecker AD, Owczarzak J, Magder L, Brown JP, Pfeiffer CD, Terndrup C, Leykum L, Stevens D, Feldstein DA, Weisenberg SA, Baghdadi JD, Morgan DJ. Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs Associated with More Aggressive Diagnostic Testing. Am J Med. 2022 07; 135(7):e182-e193.
Score: 0.022
-
Pickles K, Scherer LD, Cvejic E, Hersch J, Barratt A, McCaffery KJ. Preferences for More or Less Health Care and Association With Health Literacy of Men Eligible for Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Australia. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 10 01; 4(10):e2128380.
Score: 0.021
-
Kwon R, Allen LA, Scherer LD, Thompson JS, Abdel-Maksoud MF, McIlvennan CK, Matlock DD. The Effect of Total Cost Information on Consumer Treatment Decisions: An Experimental Survey. Med Decis Making. 2018 07; 38(5):584-592.
Score: 0.017
-
Kang SK, Scherer LD, Megibow AJ, Higuita LJ, Kim N, Braithwaite RS, Fagerlin A. A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb; 210(2):369-375.
Score: 0.016
-
Shaffer VA, Focella ES, Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Debiasing affective forecasting errors with targeted, but not representative, experience narratives. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 10; 99(10):1611-9.
Score: 0.015
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|