 Connection
Laura Scherer to Communication
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Scherer has written about Communication.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.716 |
|
|
|
-
Scherer LD, McPhetres J, Pennycook G, Kempe A, Allen LA, Knoepke CE, Tate CE, Matlock DD. Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses. Health Psychol. 2021 Apr; 40(4):274-284.
Score: 0.496
-
Scherer LD, Pennycook G. Who Is Susceptible to Online Health Misinformation? Am J Public Health. 2020 10; 110(S3):S276-S277.
Score: 0.482
-
Valentine KD, Wegier P, Shaffer VA, Scherer LD. The Impact of 4 Risk Communication Interventions on Cancer Screening Preferences and Knowledge. Med Decis Making. 2022 04; 42(3):387-397.
Score: 0.128
-
Morgan DJ, Scherer LD, Korenstein D. Improving Physician Communication About Treatment Decisions: Reconsideration of "Risks vs Benefits". JAMA. 2020 Sep 08; 324(10):937-938.
Score: 0.120
-
Saffran L, Hu S, Hinnant A, Scherer LD, Nagel SC. Constructing and influencing perceived authenticity in science communication: Experimenting with narrative. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0226711.
Score: 0.115
-
McCaffery KJ, Jansen J, Scherer LD, Thornton H, Hersch J, Carter SM, Barratt A, Sheridan S, Moynihan R, Waller J, Brodersen J, Pickles K, Edwards A. Walking the tightrope: communicating overdiagnosis in modern healthcare. BMJ. 2016 Feb 05; 352:i348.
Score: 0.087
-
Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Witteman HO, Dickson M, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Kahn VC, Exe NL, Valerio M, Holtzman LG, Scherer LD, Fagerlin A. Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs. Med Decis Making. 2014 05; 34(4):443-53.
Score: 0.075
-
Lum HD, Fischer S, Ytell K, Scherer L, O'Leary ST, Elk R, Hurley S, Washington KT, DeCamp M. Elevating Home Health Aide Input in Co-Creation of COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep; 41(9):1094-1103.
Score: 0.037
-
Thorpe A, Gurmankin Levy A, Scherer LD, Scherer AM, Drews FA, Butler JM, Fagerlin A. Impact of prior COVID-19 infection on perceptions about the benefit and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Am J Infect Control. 2024 01; 52(1):125-128.
Score: 0.037
-
Johnson SB, Parsons M, Dorff T, Moran MS, Ward JH, Cohen SA, Akerley W, Bauman J, Hubbard J, Spratt DE, Bylund CL, Swire-Thompson B, Onega T, Scherer LD, Tward J, Fagerlin A. Cancer Misinformation and Harmful Information on Facebook and Other Social Media: A Brief Report. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 07 11; 114(7):1036-1039.
Score: 0.034
-
Waters EA, Foust JL, Scherer LD, McQueen A, Taber JM. Adherence of Internet-Based Cancer Risk Assessment Tools to Best Practices in Risk Communication: Content Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021 01 25; 23(1):e23318.
Score: 0.031
-
Fridman I, Fagerlin A, Scherr KA, Scherer LD, Huffstetler H, Ubel PA. Gain-loss framing and patients' decisions: a linguistic examination of information framing in physician-patient conversations. J Behav Med. 2021 02; 44(1):38-52.
Score: 0.030
-
Scherr KA, Fagerlin A, Hofer T, Scherer LD, Holmes-Rovner M, Williamson LD, Kahn VC, Montgomery JS, Greene KL, Zhang B, Ubel PA. Physician Recommendations Trump Patient Preferences in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions. Med Decis Making. 2017 01; 37(1):56-69.
Score: 0.023
-
Holmes-Rovner M, Montgomery JS, Rovner DR, Scherer LD, Whitfield J, Kahn VC, Merkle EC, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Med Decis Making. 2015 11; 35(8):999-1009.
Score: 0.021
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|