 Connection
Laura Scherer to Patient Participation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Scherer has written about Patient Participation.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.703 |
|
|
|
-
Kang SK, Scherer LD, Megibow AJ, Higuita LJ, Kim N, Braithwaite RS, Fagerlin A. A Randomized Study of Patient Risk Perception for Incidental Renal Findings on Diagnostic Imaging Tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb; 210(2):369-375.
Score: 0.116
-
Scherr KA, Fagerlin A, Hofer T, Scherer LD, Holmes-Rovner M, Williamson LD, Kahn VC, Montgomery JS, Greene KL, Zhang B, Ubel PA. Physician Recommendations Trump Patient Preferences in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions. Med Decis Making. 2017 01; 37(1):56-69.
Score: 0.106
-
Witteman HO, Gavaruzzi T, Scherer LD, Pieterse AH, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Chipenda Dansokho S, Exe N, Kahn VC, Feldman-Stewart D, Col NF, Turgeon AF, Fagerlin A. Effects of Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods: A Systematic Review. Med Decis Making. 2016 08; 36(6):760-76.
Score: 0.104
-
Witteman HO, Scherer LD, Gavaruzzi T, Pieterse AH, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Chipenda Dansokho S, Exe N, Kahn VC, Feldman-Stewart D, Col NF, Turgeon AF, Fagerlin A. Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods: A Systematic Review. Med Decis Making. 2016 05; 36(4):453-71.
Score: 0.102
-
Holmes-Rovner M, Montgomery JS, Rovner DR, Scherer LD, Whitfield J, Kahn VC, Merkle EC, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Med Decis Making. 2015 11; 35(8):999-1009.
Score: 0.099
-
Fagerlin A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P, Col N, Feldman-Stewart D, Gavaruzzi T, Kryworuchko J, Levin CA, Pieterse AH, Reyna V, Stiggelbout A, Scherer LD, Wills C, Witteman HO. Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S8.
Score: 0.088
-
Morgan DJ, Scherer LD, Korenstein D. Improving Physician Communication About Treatment Decisions: Reconsideration of "Risks vs Benefits". JAMA. 2020 Sep 08; 324(10):937-938.
Score: 0.035
-
Hamilton JG, Lillie SE, Alden DL, Scherer L, Oser M, Rini C, Tanaka M, Baleix J, Brewster M, Craddock Lee S, Goldstein MK, Jacobson RM, Myers RE, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Waters EA. What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders. J Behav Med. 2017 Feb; 40(1):52-68.
Score: 0.027
-
McCaffery KJ, Jansen J, Scherer LD, Thornton H, Hersch J, Carter SM, Barratt A, Sheridan S, Moynihan R, Waller J, Brodersen J, Pickles K, Edwards A. Walking the tightrope: communicating overdiagnosis in modern healthcare. BMJ. 2016 Feb 05; 352:i348.
Score: 0.026
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|