Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Contact Us
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us.

Connection

Laura Scherer to Early Detection of Cancer

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Scherer has written about Early Detection of Cancer.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
4.108
 
  1. Morse B, Parmet T, Yoder G, Tate CE, Lewis CL, McCaffery K, Cappella JN, Hersch J, Schapira MM, Scherer LD. Evaluation of how US women react to a decision aid informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 18; 15(3):e087997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.698
  2. Scherer LD, Lewis CL, Cappella JN, Hersch J, McCaffery K, Tate C, Smyth HL, Mosley B, Morse B, Schapira MM. Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication. Health Psychol. 2025 Jun; 44(6):608-619.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  3. Scherer LD, Lewis CL, McCaffery K, Hersch J, Cappella JN, Tate C, Morse B, Arnett K, Mosley B, Smyth HL, Schapira MM. Mammography Screening Preferences Among Screening-Eligible Women in Their 40s : A National U.S. Survey. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug; 177(8):1069-1077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.667
  4. Valentine KD, Wegier P, Shaffer VA, Scherer LD. The Impact of 4 Risk Communication Interventions on Cancer Screening Preferences and Knowledge. Med Decis Making. 2022 04; 42(3):387-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.546
  5. Scherer LD, Valentine KD, Patel N, Baker SG, Fagerlin A. A bias for action in cancer screening? J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Jun; 25(2):149-161.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  6. Scherer LD, Kullgren JT, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Shaffer VA, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences Predict Responses to Information about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening. Med Decis Making. 2018 08; 38(6):708-718.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  7. Scherer LD, Shaffer VA, Caverly T, Scherer AM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Fagerlin A. The role of the affect heuristic and cancer anxiety in responding to negative information about medical tests. Psychol Health. 2018 02; 33(2):292-312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.406
  8. Scherer LD, Suresh K, Lewis CL, McCaffery KJ, Hersch J, Cappella JN, Morse B, Tate CE, Mosley BS, Schmiege S, Schapira MM. Assessing and Understanding Reactance, Self-Exemption, Disbelief, Source Derogation and Information Conflict in Reaction to Overdiagnosis in Mammography Screening: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation. Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov; 43(7-8):789-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  9. R?ssell EL, Bo A, Gr?nborg TK, Kristiansen IS, Borgquist S, Scherer LD, St?vring H. Danish Women Want to Participate in a Hypothetical Breast Cancer Screening with Harms and No Reduction in Mortality: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Med Decis Making. 2023 05; 43(4):403-416.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  10. Pickles K, Scherer LD, Cvejic E, Hersch J, Barratt A, McCaffery KJ. Preferences for More or Less Health Care and Association With Health Literacy of Men Eligible for Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Australia. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 10 01; 4(10):e2128380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2025 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)