 Connection
Andrea Nederveld to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrea Nederveld has written about Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.658 |
|
|
|
-
Nederveld A, Phimphasone-Brady P, Gurfinkel D, Waxmonsky JA, Kwan BM, Holtrop JS. Delivering diabetes shared medical appointments in primary care: early and mid-program adaptations and implications for successful implementation. BMC Prim Care. 2023 02 17; 24(1):52.
Score: 0.303
-
Kostiuk M, Kramer ES, Nederveld A, Hessler DM, Fisher L, Parascando JA, Oser TK. Addressing Diabetes Distress in Primary Care: Where Are We Now, and Where Do We Need to Go? Curr Diab Rep. 2025 Jan 18; 25(1):17.
Score: 0.086
-
Kwan BM, Dickinson LM, Dailey-Vail J, Glasgow RE, Gritz RM, Gurfinkel D, Hester CM, Holtrop JS, Hosokawa P, Lanigan A, Nease DE, Nederveld A, Phimphasone-Brady P, Ritchie ND, Sajatovic M, Wearner R, Begum A, Carter M, Carrigan T, Clay B, Downey D, Koren R, Trujillo SA, Waxmonsky JA. Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-Driven versus Standardized Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov; 39(15):2970-2979.
Score: 0.083
-
Gurfinkel D, Waxmonsky J, Summers Holtrop J, Kwan B, Nederveld A, Reedy J. Patient perspectives on diabetes shared medical appointments before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Fam Med. 2022 04 01; (20 Suppl 1).
Score: 0.071
-
Kwan BM, Dickinson LM, Glasgow RE, Sajatovic M, Gritz M, Holtrop JS, Nease DE, Ritchie N, Nederveld A, Gurfinkel D, Waxmonsky JA. The Invested in Diabetes Study Protocol: a cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing standardized and patient-driven diabetes shared medical appointments. Trials. 2020 Jan 10; 21(1):65.
Score: 0.061
-
Luoma KA, Leavitt IM, Marrs JC, Nederveld AL, Regensteiner JG, Dunn AL, Glasgow RE, Huebschmann AG. How can clinical practices pragmatically increase physical activity for patients with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review. Transl Behav Med. 2017 12; 7(4):751-772.
Score: 0.053
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|