 Connection
Torin Clark to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Torin Clark has written about Humans.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.391 |
|
|
|
-
Allred AR, Clark TK. A computational model of motion sickness dynamics during passive self-motion in the dark. Exp Brain Res. 2023 Sep; 241(9):2311-2332.
Score: 0.025
-
Allred AR, Kravets VG, Ahmed N, Clark TK. Modeling orientation perception adaptation to altered gravity environments with memory of past sensorimotor states. Front Neural Circuits. 2023; 17:1190582.
Score: 0.024
-
Allred AR, Clark TK. Vestibular perceptual thresholds for rotation about the yaw, roll, and pitch axes. Exp Brain Res. 2023 Apr; 241(4):1101-1115.
Score: 0.024
-
Kintz JR, Banerjee NT, Zhang JY, Anderson AP, Clark TK. Estimation of Subjectively Reported Trust, Mental Workload, and Situation Awareness Using Unobtrusive Measures. Hum Factors. 2023 09; 65(6):1142-1160.
Score: 0.023
-
Smith KJ, Datta A, Burkhart C, Clark TK. Efficacy of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation as a Display Modality Dissociated from Self-Orientation. Hum Factors. 2024 03; 66(3):862-871.
Score: 0.023
-
Voros J, Rise R, Sherman S, Durell A, Anderson AP, Clark TK. A machine learning approach to identify stochastic resonance in human perceptual thresholds. J Neurosci Methods. 2022 05 15; 374:109559.
Score: 0.022
-
Bretl KN, Clark TK. Predicting individual acclimation to the cross-coupled illusion for artificial gravity. J Vestib Res. 2022; 32(4):305-316.
Score: 0.022
-
Clark TK, Merfeld DM. Statistical approaches to identifying lapses in psychometric response data. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct; 28(5):1433-1457.
Score: 0.021
-
Suri K, Clark TK. Human vestibular perceptual thresholds for pitch tilt are slightly worse than for roll tilt across a range of frequencies. Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jun; 238(6):1499-1509.
Score: 0.020
-
Dixon JB, Clark TK. Sensorimotor impairment from a new analog of spaceflight-altered neurovestibular cues. J Neurophysiol. 2020 01 01; 123(1):209-223.
Score: 0.019
-
Clark TK, Newman MC, Karmali F, Oman CM, Merfeld DM. Mathematical models for dynamic, multisensory spatial orientation perception. Prog Brain Res. 2019; 248:65-90.
Score: 0.018
-
Bretl KN, McCusker AT, Sherman SO, Mitchell TR, Dixon JB, Clark TK. Tolerable acclimation to the cross-coupled illusion through a 10-day, incremental, personalized protocol. J Vestib Res. 2019; 29(2-3):97-110.
Score: 0.018
-
Bretl KN, Sherman SO, Dixon JB, Mitchell TR, Clark TK. A standardized, incremental protocol to increase human tolerance to the cross-coupled illusion. J Vestib Res. 2019; 29(5):229-240.
Score: 0.018
-
Anderson AP, Butterfield JS, Subramanian PS, Clark TK. Intraocular pressure and cardiovascular alterations investigated in artificial gravity as a countermeasure to spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 08 01; 125(2):567-576.
Score: 0.017
-
Clark TK, Yi Y, Galvan-Garza RC, Berm?dez Rey MC, Merfeld DM. When uncertain, does human self-motion decision-making fully utilize complete information? J Neurophysiol. 2018 04 01; 119(4):1485-1496.
Score: 0.017
-
Clark TK, Young LR. A Case Study of Human Roll Tilt Perception in Hypogravity. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Jul 01; 88(7):682-687.
Score: 0.016
-
Clark TK, Newman MC, Merfeld DM, Oman CM, Young LR. Human manual control performance in hyper-gravity. Exp Brain Res. 2015 May; 233(5):1409-20.
Score: 0.014
-
Clark TK, Newman MC, Oman CM, Merfeld DM, Young LR. Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity. J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 01; 113(7):2062-77.
Score: 0.013
-
Allred AR, Weiss H, Clark TK, Stirling L. An Augmented Reality Hand-Eye Sensorimotor Impairment Assessment for Spaceflight Operations. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024 Feb 01; 95(2):69-78.
Score: 0.006
-
Sherman SO, Shen YY, Gutierrez-Mendoza D, Schlittenhart M, Watson C, Clark TK, Anderson AP. Additive Sensory Noise Effects on Operator Performance in a Lunar Landing Simulation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023 Oct 01; 94(10):770-779.
Score: 0.006
-
Rahnev D, Desender K, Lee ALF, Adler WT, Aguilar-Lleyda D, Akdogan B, Arbuzova P, Atlas LY, Balci F, Bang JW, B?gue I, Birney DP, Brady TF, Calder-Travis J, Chetverikov A, Clark TK, Davranche K, Denison RN, Dildine TC, Double KS, Duyan YA, Faivre N, Fallow K, Filevich E, Gajdos T, Gallagher RM, de Gardelle V, Gherman S, Haddara N, Hainguerlot M, Hsu TY, Hu X, Iturrate I, Jaquiery M, Kantner J, Koculak M, Konishi M, Ko? C, Kvam PD, Kwok SC, Lebreton M, Lempert KM, Ming Lo C, Luo L, Maniscalco B, Martin A, Massoni S, Matthews J, Mazancieux A, Merfeld DM, O'Hora D, Palser ER, Paulewicz B, Pereira M, Peters C, Philiastides MG, Pfuhl G, Prieto F, Rausch M, Recht S, Reyes G, Rouault M, Sackur J, Sadeghi S, Samaha J, Seow TXF, Shekhar M, Sherman MT, Siedlecka M, Sk?ra Z, Song C, Soto D, Sun S, van Boxtel JJA, Wang S, Weidemann CT, Weindel G, Wierzchon M, Xu X, Ye Q, Yeon J, Zou F, Zylberberg A. The Confidence Database. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 03; 4(3):317-325.
Score: 0.005
-
Dixon JB, Etgen CA, Horning DS, Clark TK, Folga RV. Integration of a Vestibular Model for the Disorientation Research Device Motion Algorithm Application. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019 Oct 01; 90(10):901-907.
Score: 0.005
-
Rosenberg MJ, Galvan-Garza RC, Clark TK, Sherwood DP, Young LR, Karmali F. Human manual control precision depends on vestibular sensory precision and gravitational magnitude. J Neurophysiol. 2018 12 01; 120(6):3187-3197.
Score: 0.004
-
Galvan-Garza RC, Clark TK, Sherwood D, Diaz-Artiles A, Rosenberg M, Natapoff A, Karmali F, Oman CM, Young LR. Human perception of whole body roll-tilt orientation in a hypogravity analog: underestimation and adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2018 12 01; 120(6):3110-3121.
Score: 0.004
-
Diaz-Artiles A, Priesol AJ, Clark TK, Sherwood DP, Oman CM, Young LR, Karmali F. The Impact of Oral Promethazine on Human Whole-Body Motion Perceptual Thresholds. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Aug; 18(4):581-590.
Score: 0.004
-
Merfeld DM, Clark TK, Lu YM, Karmali F. Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 01; 115(1):39-59.
Score: 0.004
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|