Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Contact Us
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us.

Connection

Steven Bradley to Patient Selection

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Steven Bradley has written about Patient Selection.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
1.860
 
  1. Bradley SM, Spertus JA, Kennedy KF, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, Patel MR, Bryson CL, Malenka DJ, Rumsfeld JS. Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct; 174(10):1630-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  2. Bradley SM, Maddox TM, Stanislawski MA, O'Donnell CI, Grunwald GK, Tsai TT, Ho PM, Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS. Normal coronary rates for elective angiography in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: insights from the VA CART program (veterans affairs clinical assessment reporting and tracking). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 11; 63(5):417-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  3. Bradley SM, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Kennedy KF, Douglas PS, Patel MR, Anderson HV, Ting HH, Rumsfeld JS, Nallamothu BK. Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness and in-hospital procedural outcomes: insights from the NCDR. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5(3):290-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  4. Hess PL, Kini V, Liu W, Roldan P, Autruong P, Grunwald GK, O'Donnell C, Doll JA, Ho PM, Bradley SM. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 04 01; 3(4):e203144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  5. Niikura H, G?ssl M, Kshettry V, Olson S, Sun B, Askew J, Stanberry L, Garberich R, Tang L, Lesser J, Bae R, Harris KM, Bradley SM, Sorajja P. Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Are Ineligible for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 01 28; 12(2):196-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  6. Tang L, G?ssl M, Ahmed A, Garberich R, Bradley SM, Niikura H, Witt D, Pedersen WR, Bae R, Lesser JR, Harris KM, Sun B, Mudy K, Sorajja P. Contemporary Reasons and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Not Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 12; 11(12):e007220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  7. Barnes GD, Stanislawski MA, Liu W, Bar?n AE, Armstrong EJ, Ho PM, Klein A, Maddox TM, Nallamothu BK, Rumsfeld JS, Tsai TT, Bradley SM. Use of Contraindicated Antiplatelet Medications in the Setting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 07; 9(4):406-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  8. Desai NR, Bradley SM, Parzynski CS, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Patel MR, Ader J, Soufer A, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA. 2015 Nov 17; 314(19):2045-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  9. Bradley SM, Bohn CM, Malenka DJ, Graham MM, Bryson CL, McCabe JM, Curtis JP, Lambert-Kerzner A, Maynard C. Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness: Insights From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circulation. 2015 Jul 07; 132(1):20-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  10. Bradley SM, Maynard C, Bryson CL. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions in Washington State. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 01; 5(4):445-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  11. Thomas MP, Parzynski CS, Curtis JP, Seth M, Nallamothu BK, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Patel MR, Bradley SM, Gurm HS. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0138251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2024 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)