 Connection
Sean Donahue to Risk Factors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sean Donahue has written about Risk Factors.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.682 |
|
|
|
-
Pruett J, Ruland K, Donahue S. Validation of a Published Model to Reduce Burden of Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 01; 257:12-15.
Score: 0.075
-
Vaughan D, Harrell FE, Donahue SP. A Predictive Model for Amblyopia Risk Factor Diagnosis after Photoscreening. Ophthalmology. 2022 09; 129(9):1065-1067.
Score: 0.068
-
Zhou R, Pfister T, Liu Y, Chen Q, Donahue SP. Age Does Not Influence the Positive Predictive Value of Vision Screening to Detect Amblyopia Risk Factors. Ophthalmology. 2022 02; 129(2):230-231.
Score: 0.065
-
Strul S, Zheng Y, Gangaputra S, Datye K, Chen Q, Maynard L, Pittel E, Russell W, Donahue S. Pediatric diabetic retinopathy telescreening. J AAPOS. 2020 02; 24(1):10.e1-10.e5.
Score: 0.058
-
Bregman J, Donahue SP. Validation of photoscreening technology in the general pediatrics office: a prospective study. J AAPOS. 2016 Apr; 20(2):153-8.
Score: 0.045
-
Silverstein E, Donahue SP. Field Evaluation of Automated Vision Screening Instruments: Impact of Referral Criteria Choice on Screening Outcome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Nov-Dec; 52(6):364-70.
Score: 0.043
-
Garry GA, Donahue SP. Validation of Spot screening device for amblyopia risk factors. J AAPOS. 2014 Oct; 18(5):476-80.
Score: 0.040
-
Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, Arnold RW, Silbert D, Ruben JB. Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS. 2013 Feb; 17(1):4-8.
Score: 0.036
-
Dozier CC, Tarantola RM, Jiramongkolchai K, Donahue SP. Fungal eye disease at a tertiary care center: the utility of routine inpatient consultation. Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug; 118(8):1671-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Donahue SP, Baker JD. Prevalence of refractive error. Ophthalmology. 2010 Aug; 117(8):1652; author reply 1653.e1-2.
Score: 0.030
-
Colburn JD, Morrison DG, Estes RL, Li C, Lu P, Donahue SP. Longitudinal follow-up of hypermetropic children identified during preschool vision screening. J AAPOS. 2010 Jun; 14(3):211-5.
Score: 0.030
-
Morrison DG, Emanuel M, Donahue SP. Risk of refractive pathology after spontaneously regressed ROP in emmetropic patients. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2010 May-Jun; 47(3):141-4.
Score: 0.030
-
Teed RG, Bui CM, Morrison DG, Estes RL, Donahue SP. Amblyopia therapy in children identified by photoscreening. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan; 117(1):159-62.
Score: 0.029
-
Khetpal V, Donahue SP. Cortical visual impairment: etiology, associated findings, and prognosis in a tertiary care setting. J AAPOS. 2007 Jun; 11(3):235-9.
Score: 0.024
-
Minkoff OV, Donahue SP. Three-muscle surgery for infantile esotropia in children younger than age 2 years. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005 May-Jun; 42(3):144-8; qiuz 174-5.
Score: 0.021
-
Breazzano MP, Bond JB, Bearelly S, Kim DH, Donahue SP, Lum F, Olsen TW. American Academy of Ophthalmology Recommendations on Screening for Endogenous Candida Endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2022 01; 129(1):73-76.
Score: 0.016
-
Day HR, Breazzano MP, Bloch KC, Cherney EF, Donahue SP, Bond JB. Response to Kato et al.: Prevalence of, and risk factors for, hematogenous fungal endophthalmitis in patients with Candida bloodstream infection. Infection. 2019 06; 47(3):501-502.
Score: 0.014
-
Donahue SP, Yu VL. Intraocular candidiasis in candidemic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Mar; 16(3):256-7.
Score: 0.012
-
Donahue SP, Greven CM, Zuravleff JJ, Eller AW, Nguyen MH, Peacock JE, Wagener MW, Yu VL. Intraocular candidiasis in patients with candidemia. Clinical implications derived from a prospective multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jul; 101(7):1302-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Holmes JM, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Astle WF, Birch EE, Cole SR, Cotter SA, Donahue S, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Keech RV, Paysse E, Quinn GF, Repka MX, Scheiman MM. Risk of amblyopia recurrence after cessation of treatment. J AAPOS. 2004 Oct; 8(5):420-8.
Score: 0.005
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|