Connection
Jennifer Moss to Rural Population
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jennifer Moss has written about Rural Population.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
4.768 |
|
|
|
-
Bernacchi V, Hirko K, Boakye EA, Tam S, Lucas T, Moss JL. Lung cancer disparities in rural, persistent poverty counties: a secondary data analysis. BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 05; 25(1):878.
Score: 0.658
-
Hearn M, Pinto C, Moss JL. Evaluating the Connection Between Rural Travel Time and Health: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Older Adults Living in the Northeast United States. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec; 15:21501319241266114.
Score: 0.606
-
Moss JL, Hearn M, Cuffee YL, Wardecker BM, Kitt-Lewis E, Pinto CN. The role of social cohesion in explaining rural/urban differences in healthcare access and health status among older adults in the mid-Atlantic United States. Prev Med. 2023 08; 173:107588.
Score: 0.585
-
Moss JL, Pinto CN, Mama SK, Rincon M, Kent EE, Yu M, Cronin KA. Rural-urban differences in health-related quality of life: patterns for cancer survivors compared to other older adults. Qual Life Res. 2021 Apr; 30(4):1131-1143.
Score: 0.487
-
Moss JL, Ehrenkranz R, Perez LG, Hair BY, Julian AK. Geographic disparities in cancer screening and fatalism among a nationally representative sample of US adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 12; 73(12):1128-1135.
Score: 0.453
-
Moss JL, Stinchcomb DG, Yu M. Providing Higher Resolution Indicators of Rurality in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Implications for Patient Privacy and Research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 09; 28(9):1409-1416.
Score: 0.442
-
Moss JL, Liu B, Feuer EJ. Urban/Rural Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Incidence: The Mediating Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Provider Density. Womens Health Issues. 2017 Nov - Dec; 27(6):683-691.
Score: 0.396
-
Sood R, Entenman J, Kitt-Lewis E, Lennon RP, Pinto CN, Moss JL. We are all in this together: Rurality, Social cohesion, and COVID-19 prevention behaviors. J Rural Health. 2024 01; 40(1):154-161.
Score: 0.147
-
Moss JL, Pinto CN, Srinivasan S, Cronin KA, Croyle RT. Enduring Cancer Disparities by Persistent Poverty, Rurality, and Race: 1990-1992 to 2014-2018. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 06 13; 114(6):829-836.
Score: 0.136
-
Wood J, Stoltzfus KC, Popalis M, Moss JL. Perspectives on Self-Sampling for Cancer Screening From Staff at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Rural and Segregated Counties: A Preliminary Qualitative Study. Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec; 29:10732748221102819.
Score: 0.132
-
Hearn M, Fowler M, Worley SC, Moss JL. Leveraging community engagement to increase the health literacy of youth in rural Pennsylvania: The ACHIEVE program. J Rural Health. 2023 01; 39(1):153-159.
Score: 0.131
-
Moss JL, Wang M, Liang M, Kameni A, Stoltzfus KC, Onega T. County-level characteristics associated with incidence, late-stage incidence, and mortality from screenable cancers. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 12; 75:102033.
Score: 0.129
-
Moss JL, Leach K, Stoltzfus KC, Granzow M, Reiter PL, Onega T, Klesges LM, Ruffin MT. Multilevel Associations with Cancer Screening Among Women in Rural, Segregated Communities Within the Northeastern USA: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Cancer Educ. 2022 12; 37(6):1982-1992.
Score: 0.128
-
Stoltzfus KC, Popalis ML, Reiter PL, Moss JL. Perspectives on self-sampling for cancer screening among rural and urban women: Multilevel factors related to acceptability. J Rural Health. 2022 03; 38(2):391-397.
Score: 0.126
-
Moss JL, Johnson NJ, Yu M, Altekruse SF, Cronin KA. Indicators of Socioeconomic Status for Individuals, Census Tracts, and Counties: How Well Do Measures Align for Demographic Subgroups? J Registry Manag. 2020; 47(1):4-12.
Score: 0.115
-
Blake KD, Moss JL, Gaysynsky A, Srinivasan S, Croyle RT. Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 07; 26(7):992-997.
Score: 0.096
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|