Connection
Russell Glasgow to Analysis of Variance
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Russell Glasgow has written about Analysis of Variance.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
0.166 |
|
|
|
-
Estabrooks PA, Nelson CC, Xu S, King D, Bayliss EA, Gaglio B, Nutting PA, Glasgow RE. The frequency and behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun; 31(3):391-400.
Score: 0.049
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Strycker LA. Implementation, generalization and long-term results of the "choosing well" diabetes self-management intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Oct -Nov; 48(2):115-22.
Score: 0.041
-
Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22(3):223-8.
Score: 0.034
-
Klesges RC, Vasey MM, Glasgow RE. A worksite smoking modification competition: potential for public health impact. Am J Public Health. 1986 Feb; 76(2):198-200.
Score: 0.013
-
Barrera M, Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Boles SM, Feil EG. Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support?: An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. Am J Community Psychol. 2002 Oct; 30(5):637-54.
Score: 0.010
-
Patti MG, Corvera CU, Glasgow RE, Way LW. A hospital's annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr; 2(2):186-92.
Score: 0.007
-
Ruggiero L, Glasgow R, Dryfoos JM, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO, Orleans CT, Prokhorov AV, Rossi SR, Greene GW, Reed GR, Kelly K, Chobanian L, Johnson S. Diabetes self-management. Self-reported recommendations and patterns in a large population. Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr; 20(4):568-76.
Score: 0.007
-
Sorensen G, Glasgow RE, Corbett K, Topor M. Compliance with worksite nonsmoking policies: baseline results from the COMMIT study of worksites. Am J Health Promot. 1992 Nov-Dec; 7(2):103-9.
Score: 0.005
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|