 Connection
Alastair Robertson to Middle Aged
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Alastair Robertson has written about Middle Aged.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.075 |
|
|
|
-
Cleveland JC, Grover FL, Fullerton DA, Campbell DN, Mitchell MB, Lindenfeld J, Wolfel EE, Lowes BD, Shakar SF, Brieke A, Cannon A, Robertson AD. Left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation does not adversely affect one-year heart transplantation survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Sep; 136(3):774-7.
Score: 0.020
-
Aleong RG, Sauer WH, Robertson AD, Liggett SB, Bristow MR. Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and prevention of ventricular arrhythmias with bucindolol in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb; 6(1):137-43.
Score: 0.007
-
Kao DP, Wagner BD, Robertson AD, Bristow MR, Lowes BD. A personalized BEST: characterization of latent clinical classes of nonischemic heart failure that predict outcomes and response to bucindolol. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48184.
Score: 0.007
-
O'Connor CM, Fiuzat M, Carson PE, Anand IS, Plehn JF, Gottlieb SS, Silver MA, Lindenfeld J, Miller AB, White M, Walsh R, Nelson P, Medway A, Davis G, Robertson AD, Port JD, Carr J, Murphy GA, Lazzeroni LC, Abraham WT, Liggett SB, Bristow MR. Combinatorial pharmacogenetic interactions of bucindolol and ?1, a2C adrenergic receptor polymorphisms. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e44324.
Score: 0.007
-
Carson P, Fiuzat M, O'Connor C, Anand I, Plehn J, Lindenfeld JA, Silver M, White M, Miller A, Davis G, Robertson AD, Bristow M, Gottlieb S. Determination of hospitalization type by investigator case report form or adjudication committee in a large heart failure clinical trial (?-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial [BEST]). Am Heart J. 2010 Oct; 160(4):649-54.
Score: 0.006
-
Tate CW, Robertson AD, Zolty R, Shakar SF, Lindenfeld J, Wolfel EE, Bristow MR, Lowes BD. Quality of life and prognosis in heart failure: results of the Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST). J Card Fail. 2007 Nov; 13(9):732-7.
Score: 0.005
-
Feldman AM, Oren RM, Abraham WT, Boehmer JP, Carson PE, Eichhorn E, Gilbert EM, Kao A, Leier CV, Lowes BD, Mathier MA, McGrew FA, Metra M, Zisman LS, Shakar SF, Krueger SK, Robertson AD, White BG, Gerber MJ, Wold GE, Bristow MR. Low-dose oral enoximone enhances the ability to wean patients with ultra-advanced heart failure from intravenous inotropic support: results of the oral enoximone in intravenous inotrope-dependent subjects trial. Am Heart J. 2007 Nov; 154(5):861-9.
Score: 0.005
-
Lowes BD, Zolty R, Minobe WA, Robertson AD, Leach S, Hunter L, Bristow MR. Serial gene expression profiling in the intact human heart. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 May; 25(5):579-88.
Score: 0.004
-
Shakar SF, Lowes BD, Lindenfeld J, Zolty R, Simon M, Robertson AD, Bristow MR, Wolfel EE. Peak oxygen consumption and outcome in heart failure patients chronically treated with beta-blockers. J Card Fail. 2004 Feb; 10(1):15-20.
Score: 0.004
-
Krantz MJ, Kutinsky IB, Robertson AD, Mehler PS. Dose-related effects of methadone on QT prolongation in a series of patients with torsade de pointes. Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Jun; 23(6):802-5.
Score: 0.003
-
Abraham WT, Raynolds MV, Badesch DB, Wynne KM, Groves BM, Roden RL, Robertson AD, Lowes BD, Zisman LS, Voelkel NF, Bristow MR, Perryman MB. Angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: increased frequency and association with preserved haemodynamics. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2003 Mar; 4(1):27-30.
Score: 0.003
-
Krantz MJ, Lewkowiez L, Hays H, Woodroffe MA, Robertson AD, Mehler PS. Torsade de pointes associated with very-high-dose methadone. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17; 137(6):501-4.
Score: 0.003
-
Lowes BD, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, Minobe WA, Larrabee P, Ferguson D, Wolfel EE, Lindenfeld J, Tsvetkova T, Robertson AD, Quaife RA, Bristow MR. Myocardial gene expression in dilated cardiomyopathy treated with beta-blocking agents. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 02; 346(18):1357-65.
Score: 0.003
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|