Connection
John Messenger to Ultrasonography, Interventional
This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Messenger has written about Ultrasonography, Interventional.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
1.089 |
|
|
|
-
Dattilo PB, Prasad A, Honeycutt E, Wang TY, Messenger JC. Contemporary patterns of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound use among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 04; 60(22):2337-9.
Score: 0.382
-
Klein AJ, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Cleveland JC, Messenger JC. Spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection and the role of intravascular ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jun; 29(6):981-8.
Score: 0.321
-
Clegg SD, Chen SJ, Nijhof N, Kim MS, Salcedo EE, Quaife RA, Messenger JC, Bracken J, Carroll JD. Integrated 3D echo-x ray to optimize image guidance for structural heart intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar; 8(3):371-374.
Score: 0.111
-
Kim MS, Bracken J, Nijhof N, Salcedo EE, Quaife RA, Messenger JC, Carroll JD. Integrated 3D Echo-X-Ray navigation to predict optimal angiographic deployment projections for TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Aug; 7(8):847-8.
Score: 0.107
-
Lotfi A, Jeremias A, Fearon WF, Feldman MD, Mehran R, Messenger JC, Grines CL, Dean LS, Kern MJ, Klein LW. Expert consensus statement on the use of fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography: a consensus statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar 01; 83(4):509-18.
Score: 0.102
-
Maddux JT, Carroll JD, Groves BM, Messenger JC, Tseng A, Falcone E, Burchenal JE. Optimal deployment of third-generation stents: an intravascular ultrasound assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Oct; 57(2):142-7.
Score: 0.047
-
Kim MS, Eng MH, Hudson PA, Garcia JA, Wink O, Messenger JC, Carroll JD. Coronary stent fracture: clinical use of image enhancement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Apr; 3(4):446-7.
Score: 0.020
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|