Connection
John Messenger to Radial Artery
This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Messenger has written about Radial Artery.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
1.539 |
|
|
|
-
Gluckman TJ, Wang L, Spinelli KJ, Petersen JL, Huang P, Amin A, Messenger JC, Rao SV. Differential Use and Impact of Bleeding Avoidance Strategies on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Related Bleeding Stratified by Predicted Risk. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 06; 13(6):e008702.
Score: 0.173
-
Rymer JA, Kaltenbach LA, Kochar A, Hess CN, Gilchrist IC, Messenger JC, Harrington RA, Jolly SS, Jacobs AK, Abbott JD, Wojdyla DM, Krucoff MW, Rao SV. Comparison of Rates of Bleeding and Vascular Complications Before, During, and After Trial Enrollment in the SAFE-PCI Trial for Women. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 05; 12(5):e007086.
Score: 0.160
-
Valle JA, Kaltenbach LA, Bradley SM, Yeh RW, Rao SV, Gurm HS, Armstrong EJ, Messenger JC, Waldo SW. Variation in the Adoption of Transradial?Access for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the NCDR CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 11 27; 10(22):2242-2254.
Score: 0.144
-
Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, Dai D, Hillegass WB, Krucoff MW, Kutcher MA, Messenger JC, Pancholy S, Piana RN, Rao SV. Response to letter regarding article, "The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry". Circulation. 2015 Feb 24; 131(8):e358.
Score: 0.120
-
Rao SV, Hess CN, Barham B, Aberle LH, Anstrom KJ, Patel TB, Jorgensen JP, Mazzaferri EL, Jolly SS, Jacobs A, Newby LK, Gibson CM, Kong DF, Mehran R, Waksman R, Gilchrist IC, McCourt BJ, Messenger JC, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, Krucoff MW. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67.
Score: 0.115
-
Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, Dai D, Hillegass WB, Krucoff MW, Kutcher MA, Messenger JC, Pancholy S, Piana RN, Rao SV. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2014 Jun 03; 129(22):2277-86.
Score: 0.113
-
Hess CN, Rao SV, Kong DF, Aberle LH, Anstrom KJ, Gibson CM, Gilchrist IC, Jacobs AK, Jolly SS, Mehran R, Messenger JC, Newby LK, Waksman R, Krucoff MW. Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women). Am Heart J. 2013 Sep; 166(3):421-8.
Score: 0.107
-
Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, Baklanov DV, Kim LK, Wong SC, Minutello RM, Messenger JC, Moussa I, Garratt KN, Piana RN, Hillegass WB, Cohen MG, Gilchrist IC, Rao SV. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation. 2013 Jun 11; 127(23):2295-306.
Score: 0.106
-
Baklanov D, Messenger J, Rao S. Reply: To PMID 23265340. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 11; 61(23):2394.
Score: 0.105
-
Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, Subherwal SS, Feldman DN, Garratt KN, Curtis JP, Messenger JC, Rao SV. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29; 61(4):420-426.
Score: 0.103
-
Casserly IP, Messenger JC. Technique and catheters. Cardiol Clin. 2009 Aug; 27(3):417-32.
Score: 0.081
-
Ahsan MJ, Ahmad S, Latif A, Lateef N, Ahsan MZ, Abusnina W, Nathan S, Altin SE, Kolte DS, Messenger JC, Tannenbaum M, Goldsweig AM. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Sep 05; 8(6):640-650.
Score: 0.050
-
Manly DA, Karrowni W, Rymer JA, Kaltenbach LA, Swaminathan RV, Messenger JC, Abbott JD, Seto A, Panetta C, Brilakis E, Nikolakopoulos I, Gilchrist IC, Kaul P, Dakik H, Rao SV. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With History of CABG Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Versus Femoral Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 26; 14(8):907-916.
Score: 0.046
-
Vora AN, Peterson ED, McCoy LA, Garratt KN, Kutcher MA, Marso SP, Roe MT, Messenger JC, Rao SV. The Impact of Bleeding Avoidance Strategies on Hospital-Level Variation in Bleeding Rates Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25; 9(8):771-779.
Score: 0.032
-
Hess CN, Krucoff MW, Sheng S, Anstrom KJ, Barham WB, Gilchrist IC, Harrington RA, Jacobs AK, Mehran R, Messenger JC, Mark DB, Rao SV. Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: Results of the Study of Access Site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women quality-of-life substudy. Am Heart J. 2015 Aug; 170(2):371-9.
Score: 0.030
-
Bradley SM, Rao SV, Curtis JP, Parzynski CS, Messenger JC, Daugherty SL, Rumsfeld JS, Gurm HS. Change in hospital-level use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and periprocedural outcomes: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jul; 7(4):550-9.
Score: 0.028
-
Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, Collins JF, Haugen SJ, Garcia JA, Baltz JH, Cleveland JC, Novitzky D, Grover FL. Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: Results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation. 2012 Jun 12; 125(23):2827-35.
Score: 0.025
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|